Kamis, 26 Mei 2011

salman khan

salman khan. Salman Khan
  • Salman Khan



  • MacCoaster
    Sep 22, 12:50 AM
    Originally posted by wilburpan

    Granted www.cpuscorecard.com doesn't really clarify what benchmarks they use, but in their estimation, a dual 1.25GHz Mac beats a 2.4 Ghz P4 by a hair, and is just a little behind a 2.8 GHz P4. Likewise, a 800MHz G4 is very comparable to a 1.8 Ghz P4. The important thing that I see in this ranking is that in perusing the rest of this website, the people who came up with these ratings do not look to be particularly Mac friendly.

    Based on this, I would have to disagree with your assertion that "the g4 cannot beat the p4 in performance", unless your only criteria for performance is sheer GHz speed. It seems to me that at the high end, the two chips are at least competitive, and in the middle of the pack, I would say that Macs are a better buy.
    I wouldn't say that 800MHz G4 would match 1.8GHz. Notice the 1.25GHz they used is *DUAL* processor 1.25GHz. Maybe *DUAL* 800MHzs.





    salman khan. Salman Khan -7
  • Salman Khan -7



  • MacFly123
    Feb 18, 06:44 PM
    How much money round that table??!!

    That's a lot of money in one room! :eek::eek:

    Haha, that's what I was thinking! :D Very powerful and influential people around that table. Kind of odd and surreal! They are just normal people.

    He doesn't look anywhere near as bad as he did in those "genuine" photographs from a certain news organisation. :rolleyes:

    I can't seem to find those pics. Did they publish them? Do you have a link?

    Notice Steve is the only guy without wine?

    He is undergoing treatment for cancer.
    What is so strange about him not drinking alcohol?
    :confused:

    Actually, there are just two guys with Wine in the whole room, they all have water or something like that... (Check out the big flickr pic from the previous poster)

    Yes it looks like there are other people with water but does Steve drink? I don't think he does. :confused:

    Everyone is dressed up but Steve....awesome.

    He did wear a tux to the oscars at least.

    Ya it was weird seeing Steve in a tux or anything but his standard uniform haha! :D

    I would honestly love to see his closet lol! Probably like Earnest... Nothing but black turtle necks, Levis jeans, and NewBalance sneakers haha! :p

    [SIZE=1]Get better for the sake of mankind, mr jobs!

    No kidding! Please Steve! :(

    Good to see that's Steve is still well enough to attend such things. Still very thin mind you.

    Yes, for sure!





    salman khan. Salman Khan feels awkward
  • Salman Khan feels awkward



  • GekkePrutser
    Apr 26, 04:40 AM
    Would love to see:






    salman khan. Upcoming Movies of Salman Khan
  • Upcoming Movies of Salman Khan



  • pbh444
    Mar 27, 09:01 PM
    I scored two 32GB iPad1s from Verizon on Friday in South Portland Maine.

    I kept check the online site all day in case the local Verizon store was out, but the Verizon online prices were still at the pre-sale price. ($529, $629, $729).

    I just noticed now (Sunday, 9 PM EDT) that the Verizon online iPad LANDING page states that the iPad1-Mifi combos begin at $429 ($100 less than Friday). However, when you click on "Build" package, you are taken to the page with the OLD (pre-sale) prices.

    Maybe they are waiting until Monday AM to fix the "build" page, but you can RIGHT now short circuit it and jump right to the individual combo package pages.

    16GB-mifi $429
    http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=packageItem&action=viewPackageDetail&packageId=165

    32GB-mifi $529
    http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=packageItem&action=viewPackageDetail&packageId=166

    16GB-mifi $629
    http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=packageItem&action=viewPackageDetail&packageId=167

    The Wifi only versions will probably NOT be offered online.

    It is also my assumption is that these prices will NOT be available in the stores, because when I scored my two 32GB wifi only, the clerk told me that there was not a SINGLE mifi to be had in the state of Maine.





    salman khan. Salman Khan s Heroes to hit
  • Salman Khan s Heroes to hit



  • Cassie
    Apr 2, 07:22 PM
    Anywhere from between $3.50-3.60 a gallon here just north of San Antonio, Texas.





    salman khan. salman-khan-wallpapers-9
  • salman-khan-wallpapers-9



  • scottsjack
    Apr 12, 01:57 PM
    Pages and Number are TRASH compared to Word and Excel(especially excel)

    Keynote is actually pretty good!

    Dont be a uninformed fanboy. k? Thanks

    Pages and Numbers are much easier to use, and far nicer to look at than Office. If I don't need the horsepower I prefer iWork. If I do need the horsepower I have Office 2003 running on a late 2009 mini that is Windows 7 only. Office 2003 works great with W7, and it's not all blue looking like some of the newer versions.

    As usual Windows runs MS software much better than Mac OS does.





    salman khan. Salman Khan
  • Salman Khan



  • anetoiu
    Dec 4, 05:43 PM
    most of the people who don't stop eating for like 3 months to buy an iPhone 4, will probably afford and buy that kit but the other ones like me won't do that

    I don't even have an iPhone 4 !

    Besides those things, I'm glad for that kid making so much money with such a brilliant idea.





    salman khan. The Katrina Kaif-SaLman Khan
  • The Katrina Kaif-SaLman Khan



  • flopticalcube
    Apr 12, 12:59 PM
    Affirmative action has it's pitfalls. You should ask such organizations why they feel the need to segregate themselves along racial lines. Let's hope the day comes when such institutions are discarded.





    salman khan. Salman Khan Goes Unnoticed in
  • Salman Khan Goes Unnoticed in



  • peterdevries
    Apr 13, 12:44 AM
    Do you mean you have actually met people that are totally happy. Really dam your lucky I have never met people in all my life that did not bitch about everything...take your pick they hate something of it even their own kids. :rolleyes:

    If you quote me, than please do it properly. And if you want to make a point, try to make it coherent, because you are not making sense at all. Lastly, loving or hating anyone's kids doesn't have anything to do with the reason why the ribbon in MS products is a flawed design. :rolleyes:





    salman khan. The Salman Khan Hair
  • The Salman Khan Hair



  • ct2k7
    May 2, 08:10 PM
    on a mission like this ... you bring the "Lab" with you

    Unless the microgenetics machines are small, well, there are several stages in DNA transcription and reverse transcriptase, which would make several conditions unsuitable. Heat destroys it. It can be awfully slow. There are at least 6 stages using different equipment.





    salman khan. Salman Khan Family
  • Salman Khan Family



  • ChazUK
    Mar 26, 04:17 PM
    YOU MEAN TO SAY THE MEDIA LIED TO US! :mad:
    :D:D:D:D





    salman khan. Salman Khan out of Prabhu
  • Salman Khan out of Prabhu



  • MattSepeta
    Mar 29, 01:58 PM
    It is funny HOW NO ONE clicked on these links. It has all the info here, and you can see what the differences are... or people can just keep arguing.

    An image like the ones linked are just about the best way to illustrate the difference.

    having attempted to read the entire thread, I cannot for the life of me understand what thatisme and flosseR are arguing about!

    It is SO SIMPLE. Take lens "X", assuming it functions on both Crop and FF cameras.

    Shoot a scene with "X" on a FF camera. If you crop it down to .625 of it's original size from the center, you will have the EXACT same image as the crop sensor camera produces with "X", noise/details/crap like that aside.

    There is no argument here.





    salman khan. Salman Khan Profile
  • Salman Khan Profile



  • skunk
    Apr 14, 04:38 PM
    Terrible analogy.

    As soon as I can choose whether or not to buy the services your analogy becomes valid. That will be the day :rolleyes:You do so by exercising your voting rights. The services are sold as a bundle. You get to choose which bundle. In theory.





    salman khan. Salman Khan amp; Katrina Kaif New
  • Salman Khan amp; Katrina Kaif New



  • kmcrawford
    Jan 6, 05:49 PM
    Any know why some users photos don't sync? My photo doesn't show up on my wife's phone, but many of her friends photos' do.

    btw, I have seen other info posted like my friend's Sister's name and etc.





    salman khan. Salman Khan hospitalized
  • Salman Khan hospitalized



  • amols
    Sep 27, 12:15 PM
    This is going to be the most rockin' update eva!!1

    Do you know something we don't ??





    salman khan. Salman-Khan-Wallpaper-003
  • Salman-Khan-Wallpaper-003



  • GregA2
    Nov 11, 02:26 AM
    That sucks Justin Long isn't going to be in the ads anymore. I hope they don't stop them altogether- I was looking forward to some really good ones once Zune and Vista get here... :D





    salman khan. asin-salman-khan-
  • asin-salman-khan-



  • edesignuk
    Dec 18, 10:29 AM
    ^ oh well, you disapprove.




    salman khan. Salman Khan – The New Khatron
  • Salman Khan – The New Khatron



  • KohPhiPhi
    Apr 20, 05:54 PM
    My MBA Ultimate is perfect for me right now as my sole working machine. This is simply a super balanced laptop for those seeking mobility and reasonable performance. No need for me to fix what's not broken right now.

    I won't be jumping in on a SB+HD3000 upgrade, so I will pass on the next update until Ivy comes out (as long as it's paired with a decent GPU and not with a lame HD3000-like).





    salman khan. Aishwarya Rai amp; Salman Khan
  • Aishwarya Rai amp; Salman Khan



  • MacRumorUser
    Jul 17, 05:37 AM
    picking mine up today.





    gammamonk
    Nov 11, 10:00 PM
    どうもマックです。   - Nice to meet you, I'm a Mac.

    こんにちはパソコンです。 - Hi, I'm a PC.

    っオ、iPod、何聴いてる  - Oh, an iPod, what are you listening to?

    Eurobeat. - Eurobeat.

    Eurobeat? - Eurobeat?

    いいですよねiPod. iTunesは使いやすいし、Podcastも楽しみだし。 - iPods are great. iTunes is easy to use, and I can look forward to my Podcasts.

    マックなら、iPodと同じぐらい簡単に写真やムービを楽しめる。iLifeが付いてるよ。 - You know, for a mac, we enjoy things with pictures and movies just as easily as using an iPod. I come with iLife.

    へ〜iLife。私もクールなソフトが色々付いてますよ。 - Oh, iLife? I also come with all kinds of cool software.

    オ〜例えば。  - Oh, for example?

    計算器。    - Calculator.

    後は?     - What else?

    時計。 - Clock.





    doctor-don
    Jun 14, 10:02 AM
    depends on who you are. my bill with 500 more minutes and rollover, 1500 text and unlimited data is only $7 more than yours. of course I have had my voice plan for almost 8 years

    and tmobile is simply awful

    Only your [minority] opinion. I have been a customer of T-Mo for more than a decade, and I have no complaints except coverage in remote areas (which might be alleviated only with a satellite phone). My 1,000 family minutes and 4 phones and 2 datas cost $177/month, btw.





    rnb2
    Apr 24, 11:39 PM
    Honestly, if they offered an 8GB RAM option, I'd be sorely tempted to go from my current 2009 i7 iMac and 11.6" 4GB MBA to a maxed-out 13" SB MBA + 27" monitor. I would probably also have to move from my current FW800 OWC RAID to something with Thunderbolt, since I'd need something that could daisy-chain with the monitor.

    I know that I would lose the top-end performance of the iMac, but it would be worth it to jump to a truly next-generation, all solid state laptop. I need the RAM to run Aperture and Photoshop CS5 together effectively, but I think I could live with everything else. I'd really love to get down to one computer that is decent when hooked up to a 27" monitor, and also very portable for the limited traveling that I do. The C2D MBA is fine for my travel needs, but not good enough for my day-to-day use at home.

    I could go with a 15" MacBook Pro, but I really prefer the forward-looking MBA design and weight, and the price is more attractive on the MBA once you start looking at SSD options in the MBP.

    Do I think they'll offer the 8GB option this year? I suspect not, but we may then see it in 2012.





    macUser2007
    Apr 19, 04:27 PM
    Nothing, directly. I was responding to a previous comment as you can see. There is an indirect connection to the cartoonist issue. My feeling is that there's a general failure to understand why Apple has a restrictive policy regarding what types of apps can appear in the app store. My post addressed the issue regarding the prohibition of pornography, instead of the issue of what defines an app with defamatory content as was the case with the cartoonist. There's also, in my opinion, a failure to appreciate that the lack of consistency in the app approval process is a result of Apple being unable to anticipate every scenario and nuance that is presented by certain apps, and the fact that Apple hires people to review apps. You can't realistically expect different people to always agree on situations that are slightly different. In order to respond to the explosion of submitted apps, Apple must have had to hire a lot of new reviewers. That means that you may have less control over the quality and experience level of the people that you have working as reviewers.

    This is a whole lot of excuses, for a policy which is simply inexcusable.

    There are many other companies which sell applications and content, which don't resort to such draconian measures. When I download a new version of Firefox on my desktop, I don't get a warning that it may provide access to inappropriate content. Neither Apple, nor MS arbitrarily ban desktop applications from being purchased or distributed.

    Apple wants to be a publishing distributor. If they can object to and ban the cartoon today, why not object to and ban an article in The Economist tomorrow?

    Apple has become Big Brother. It wants to control every purchase and every download, so it doesn't miss a single dollar you may otherwise spend outside the walled garden. And these are the predictable consequences.





    thatisme
    Mar 29, 08:55 AM
    You have, of course, argued differently: that the same focal length on the same camera will produce different images. Which is clearly nonsense:

    Taken out of context yet again. Congratulations!

    EF-S 200mm on a 1.6 crop camera will yield the same image as an EF 200mm on a FF camera. If you put that EF 200 back onto the 1.6 camera, the image is different.

    How hard is that to understand?



    Tidak ada komentar:

    Posting Komentar